The main similarity is that they both feature an adjustable hosel that allows you to tweak loft and lie. The Mavrik has come a long way from the X Hot driver so there are very few spec similarities. The result is straighter shots across the expanse of the face. The face is thinner around the perimeter and thicker in the center or sweet spot. The Callaway X Hot driver features one of the earliest iteration of Variable Face Thickness. The Mavrik also features Jailbreak bars to stabilize the incredibly thin, hot face. helped Callaway sort through millions of drive scenarios to come up with the face architecture to accommodate more varying situations. The Mavrik features FS2S titanium which is 6 grams lighter than normal titanium.Ī.I. There is always some overlap – they are both Callaway drivers after all.īut the Mavrik obviously has more modern features while the X Hot driver takes a more analog approach to ball speed. Where these 2 drivers diverge from each other is how they produce ball speed. Right off the bat, the central thesis behind both of these drivers is the same: produce more ball speed for longer drives. But do you need to spend a lot on a newer model?ĭo older models perform just as well in 2021? To answer this question we are going to pit a modern Callaway driver against one of yesteryear to see how they compare. Stressful because it can be hard to determine how much you need to spend.Ĭallaway drivers are known for performance – that’s a given. Having cause to be in the market for a new driver can be an exciting and stressful situation.Įxciting because you know you’re going to get your hands on a new driver. Callaway Mavrik Vs Callaway X Hot Driver Review & Comparison
0 kommentar(er)
